A landmark climate-change lawsuit brought by young people against the US government can proceed, the Supreme Court said on 2 November. The case, Juliana v. United States, had been scheduled to begin trial on 29 October in Eugene, Oregon, in a federal district court. But those plans were scrapped last month after President Donald Trump’s administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene and dismiss the case.
The plaintiffs, who include 21 people ranging in age from 11 to 22, allege that the government has violated their constitutional rights to life, liberty and property by failing to prevent dangerous climate change. They are asking the district court to order the federal government to prepare a plan that will ensure the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere falls below 350 parts per million by 2100, down from an average of 405 parts per million in 2017.
By contrast, the US Department of Justice argues that “there is no right to ‘a climate system capable of sustaining human life’” — as the Juliana plaintiffs assert.
Bear forever in mind that this is a conservative government, a Republican government, arguing that no one has the right to a livable planet.
see. look at this. 10/10 shield use. covers whole body. no bullets for sam
what is this. weak. steve your legs are wide open. steve your feet are swiss cheese. steve your dick is gone it just got blown off. steve. steve. your dick is gone
How did you take down Captain America?
We shot him in the legs because his shield is the size of a dinner plate and he’s an idiot
hawkeye is… not even particularly hawk themed, even if hawks went ‘caw’, which they don’t. idk why people are surprised to find out the phrase originated with a character who was part crow.
Shineheart26 